If we want to compare Tactical Periodisation with different training methodologies, it is important to determine which football dimension is situated in the nucleus of the process. One of the basic demands that is put up in front of the player is the ability of being able to respond to game requests developing socio-affective relationships towards teammates and competative relationships with opposing teams in order to achieve common goals. The manager is the one who decides what kind of players or teams he wants to create. If it is more important to be „game intelligent“ than just physically fit, then training should stimulate development of the autonomous decision-making skills, such as cognitive skills that are important for successfully dealing with demanding tactical situations in the game, therefore Tactical Periodisation ignores analytical exercises for the development of any dimension in isolation. The players who weren't exposed enough to specific decision -making situations in which they should find the best solution in short time, or who were trained following linear progressive way in closed environment, have problems dealing with unfamiliar situations in the game when they have to take a quality tactical decision in short time. The only way to facilitate these processes is to design specific and significent training tasks leaving traditionally way of thinking and thinking „outside the box“, in order to prepare the players for continuously thinking, identifying and anticipating of the football situation during the game.